ridge: be formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents point
Weight: 0.58
, location
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, element
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings slope
Weight: 0.33
, west point
Weight: 0.33
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.33
, mountain range
Weight: 0.32
, north pole
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be formed 1.00
is formed 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, be formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(slope, be formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, is formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mountain range, is formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mountain range, is formed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(slope, be formed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(slope, be formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mountain range, be formed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mountain range, be formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ridge, be formed)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ridge, is formed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ridge, is formed)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ridge, is formed)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(ridge, is formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ridge, be formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ridge, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mountain range, is formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mountain range, be formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ridge, be formed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(slope, be formed)