riding: be with flat tire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.57
, sport
Weight: 0.53
, exercise
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, hobby
Weight: 0.47
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.33
, bicycle race
Weight: 0.32
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.32
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with flat tire 1.00
be with flat tire harder 0.95
be with tire 0.95
be with tire harder 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(riding, be with flat tire)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(riding, be with flat tire harder)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(riding, be with flat tire harder)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(riding, be with flat tire harder)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(riding, be with flat tire harder)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(riding, be with tire)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(riding, be with tire harder)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(riding, be with tire harder)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(riding, be with tire)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(riding, be with tire)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(riding, be with tire harder)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(riding, be with tire)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(riding, be with tire harder)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(riding, be with flat tire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(riding, be with flat tire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(riding, be with flat tire)