rifling: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.40
, barrel
Weight: 0.36
, gun
Weight: 0.32
Siblings interval
Weight: 0.27
, angle
Weight: 0.27
, magnetic field
Weight: 0.26
, accuracy
Weight: 0.26
, domain
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
is invented 0.98
were invented 0.97
is developed 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(gun, were invented)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rifling, was invented)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(gun, was invented)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rifling, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(gun, was invented)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(gun, were invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gun, were invented)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gun, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(gun, was invented)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(rifling, was invented)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(gun, were invented)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(rifling, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rifling, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rifling, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rifling, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gun, was invented)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(gun, were invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gun, was invented)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rifling, was invented)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(gun, were invented)