ring: has physical part fingers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.61
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.58
, apparatus
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wedding ring
Weight: 0.83
, key ring
Weight: 0.72
, ring finger
Weight: 0.70
, pyridine
Weight: 0.49
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fingers 1.00
has physical part finger 0.93
turn on fingers 0.91
turn fingers black 0.88
make fingers green 0.87
get stuck on fingers 0.87
stuck on people 's fingers 0.86
turn fingers green 0.86
get stuck on people 's fingers 0.86
go on finger 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wedding ring, has physical part finger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(wedding ring, go on finger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wedding ring, has physical part finger)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wedding ring, has physical part finger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(wedding ring, go on finger)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wedding ring, go on finger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(ring, has physical part fingers)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ring, turn on fingers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ring, turn on fingers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(ring, get stuck on fingers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(ring, turn on fingers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ring, turn on fingers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ring, get stuck on fingers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ring, get stuck on fingers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ring, go on finger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ring, go on finger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ring, go on finger)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ring, has physical part finger)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ring, has physical part finger)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ring, go on finger)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(ring, has physical part finger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ring, has physical part finger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ring, get stuck on fingers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ring, has physical part fingers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(wedding ring, has physical part finger)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ring, has physical part fingers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wedding ring, go on finger)