rise: be against good band

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents effect
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.56
, event
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fall
Weight: 0.63
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, decrease
Weight: 0.33
, erosion
Weight: 0.32
, growth
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be against good band 1.00
be against band 0.97
be against punk 0.82
be against considered punk 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rise, be against good band)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rise, be against band)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(rise, be against band)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rise, be against band)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rise, be against band)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rise, be against punk)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rise, be against considered punk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(rise, be against punk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(rise, be against considered punk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rise, be against punk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rise, be against considered punk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rise, be against punk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rise, be against considered punk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rise, be against good band)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(rise, be against good band)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rise, be against good band)