rise: be in heart rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents effect
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.56
, event
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fall
Weight: 0.63
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, decrease
Weight: 0.33
, erosion
Weight: 0.32
, growth
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in heart rate 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in heart rate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rise, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(decrease, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(decrease, be in heart rate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rise, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(rise, be in heart rate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(rise, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rise, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in heart rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rise, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rise, be in heart rate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(decrease, be in heart rate)