risk: have important assessments

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.67
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
, attribute
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings high blood pressure
Weight: 0.71
, drug use
Weight: 0.66
, poverty
Weight: 0.63
, obesity
Weight: 0.62
, interest
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important assessments 1.00
have assessments 0.98
assessments 0.98
assessment 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(risk, have important assessments)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(risk, have assessments)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(risk, have assessments)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(risk, assessments)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(risk, assessments)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(risk, have assessments)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(risk, assessment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(risk, assessments)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(risk, assessment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, have assessments)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(risk, assessment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(risk, assessments)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(risk, assessment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(risk, have important assessments)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(risk, have important assessments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(risk, have important assessments)