river: be more sensitive to pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creek
Weight: 0.75
, stream
Weight: 0.70
, bridge
Weight: 0.67
, fresh water
Weight: 0.66
Siblings nile
Weight: 0.69
, lake superior
Weight: 0.68
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.68
, ocean
Weight: 0.66
, lake erie
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more sensitive to pollution 1.00
has state pollution 0.87
get affected by pollution 0.87
get polluted 0.79
become polluted 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ocean, has state pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ocean, has state pollution)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(ocean, has state pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(river, be more sensitive to pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(river, get affected by pollution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(river, get affected by pollution)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(river, get affected by pollution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(river, become polluted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(river, become polluted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(river, get polluted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(river, get polluted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(river, become polluted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(river, get polluted)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(river, get affected by pollution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(river, become polluted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(river, get polluted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, be more sensitive to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(river, be more sensitive to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(river, be more sensitive to pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ocean, has state pollution)