robbery: is second degree

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motive
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.62
, violence
Weight: 0.59
, felony
Weight: 0.54
Siblings kidnapping
Weight: 0.36
, murder
Weight: 0.36
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.36
, homicide
Weight: 0.36
, rape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is second degree 1.00
is degree 0.92
have 4 degrees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(murder, have 4 degrees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(murder, have 4 degrees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(murder, have 4 degrees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(robbery, is second degree)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(robbery, is degree)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(robbery, is degree)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is degree)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(robbery, is degree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is second degree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(robbery, is second degree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is second degree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(murder, have 4 degrees)