:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dress, is zara)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(scarf, is zara)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(scarf, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(scarf, is zara)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(dress, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(dress, is zara)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(robe, is zara)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(robe, is zara)
Typical implies Plausible
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(robe, is zara)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scarf, is zara)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(robe, is zara)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dress, is zara)