robert: be famous indiana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents writer
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.59
, author
Weight: 0.57
, player
Weight: 0.57
Siblings robert frost
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous indiana 1.00
be allen stanford like bernie madoff 0.77
was more successful than william wallace 0.77
is lee famous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(robert, be famous indiana)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(robert, was more successful than william wallace)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(robert, be allen stanford like bernie madoff)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(robert, is lee famous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(robert, be allen stanford like bernie madoff)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(robert, is lee famous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(robert, was more successful than william wallace)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(robert, be allen stanford like bernie madoff)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(robert, was more successful than william wallace)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(robert, is lee famous)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(robert, be allen stanford like bernie madoff)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(robert, was more successful than william wallace)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(robert, is lee famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(robert, be famous indiana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(robert, be famous indiana)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(robert, be famous indiana)