robot: be at science fiction movie

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sentry
Weight: 0.39
, joystick
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.35
, gyroscope
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at science fiction movie 1.00
be at science fiction 0.98
be at novel 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(character, be at novel)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(robot, be at science fiction movie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(character, be at novel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(character, be at novel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(character, be at novel)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(robot, be at science fiction movie)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(robot, be at science fiction movie)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(robot, be at science fiction)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(robot, be at science fiction)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(robot, be at science fiction)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(robot, be at science fiction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(robot, be at science fiction movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(robot, be at science fiction movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(character, be at novel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(robot, be at science fiction movie)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(character, be at novel)