robot: think

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.62
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bender
Weight: 0.57
, sentry
Weight: 0.39
, joystick
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
think 1.00
know time 0.84
do things 0.84
do 0.83
be like hisoka 0.77
be like annoyatron 0.77
be like chromecast 0.77
learn do 0.76
feel about element in beowulf 0.76
feel about element 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(device, know time)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(robot, think)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(electronic device, know time)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(robot, think)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(electronic device, know time)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(device, know time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, know time)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(device, know time)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(device, know time)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(robot, think)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(electronic device, know time)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(robot, think)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(robot, think)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robot, think)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(robot, think)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(electronic device, know time)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(device, know time)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(electronic device, know time)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(robot, think)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(device, know time)