rock music: was popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, style
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.71
, pop music
Weight: 0.67
, prog
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
was popular 1.00
is popular 0.95
be popular today 0.89
was controversial 0.79
was in 50s 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(music, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, was popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(music, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(music, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(classical music, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(music, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, was popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pop music, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, is popular)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(classical music, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(classical music, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rock music, was popular)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rock music, is popular)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, is popular)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rock music, is popular)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rock music, be popular today)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rock music, be popular today)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rock music, be popular today)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(rock music, was controversial)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rock music, was controversial)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(rock music, was in 50s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rock music, was in 50s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rock music, was controversial)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rock music, was in 50s)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rock music, is popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was in 50s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was controversial)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rock music, be popular today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, was popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(classical music, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rock music, was popular) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is popular)