rock n roll: was similar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movement
Weight: 0.61
, country
Weight: 0.57
, pop music
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pink floyd
Weight: 0.68
, punk rock
Weight: 0.35
, glam rock
Weight: 0.34
, rock music
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was similar 1.00
be similar 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pop music, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rock n roll, was similar)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(movement, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rock n roll, was similar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(movement, be similar)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pop music, be similar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be similar)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(movement, be similar)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, be similar)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pink floyd, be similar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pop music, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rock n roll, was similar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(movement, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rock n roll, was similar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pink floyd, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pink floyd, be similar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, be similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rock music, be similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rock n roll, was similar)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rock n roll, be similar)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rock n roll, be similar)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rock n roll, be similar)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, be similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(rock n roll, was similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(movement, be similar)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pop music, be similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rock music, be similar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pink floyd, be similar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(movement, be similar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(rock n roll, was similar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pop music, be similar)