rodent: adapt to heat in deserts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt to heat in deserts 1.00
adapt to heat 0.90
survie in hot desert 0.83
survie in desert 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rodent, survie in hot desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(rodent, survie in hot desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rodent, survie in hot desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(rodent, survie in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(rodent, survie in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rodent, survie in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(rodent, survie in hot desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(rodent, survie in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, adapt to heat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(rodent, adapt to heat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rodent, adapt to heat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rodent, adapt to heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(rodent, adapt to heat in deserts)