rodent: be naturally inclined run on wheel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be naturally inclined run on wheel 1.00
be naturally inclined run 0.92
run on wheels 0.79
run in wheels 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(rodent, run on wheels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(rodent, run in wheels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(rodent, run in wheels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(rodent, run on wheels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rodent, run in wheels)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(rodent, run on wheels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rodent, run in wheels)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(rodent, run on wheels)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rodent, be naturally inclined run)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be naturally inclined run)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rodent, be naturally inclined run)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(rodent, be naturally inclined run)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rodent, be naturally inclined run on wheel)