:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodeo, is killed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(rodeo, is killed)
Similarity expansion
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodeo, is killed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rodeo, is dead)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(rodeo, is killed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(rodeo, is dead)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(rodeo, is killed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(rodeo, is dead)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(rodeo, is killed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(rodeo, is dead)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(rodeo, is killed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(rodeo, is killed)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings