rolling stone: is famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rock
Weight: 0.65
, site
Weight: 0.63
, periodical
Weight: 0.62
, client
Weight: 0.61
Siblings paint
Weight: 0.59
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, rock salt
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, historical site
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is famous 1.00
is popular 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(site, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rolling stone, is famous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(site, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(site, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(site, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rolling stone, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rolling stone, is famous)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rolling stone, is popular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rolling stone, is popular)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rolling stone, is popular)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rolling stone, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rolling stone, is famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rolling stone, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(site, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rolling stone, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(site, is popular)