rolling: be in football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.62
, process
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.57
, hit
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.52
Siblings spinning
Weight: 0.32
, jumping
Weight: 0.32
, grinding
Weight: 0.32
, swing
Weight: 0.32
, slide
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in football 1.00
be in basketball 0.85
be in volleyball 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(jumping, be in football)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(jumping, be in basketball)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(jumping, be in volleyball)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(jumping, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(jumping, be in football)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(jumping, be in basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(jumping, be in basketball)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(jumping, be in volleyball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(jumping, be in volleyball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(rolling, be in football)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be in football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rolling, be in football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(jumping, be in football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jumping, be in basketball)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rolling, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jumping, be in volleyball)