rom: be considered permanent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents file
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, app
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cd rom
Weight: 0.56
, nokia
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, pda
Weight: 0.33
, crt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered permanent 1.00
is permanent 0.96
be called permanent memory 0.85
is permenant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(rom, be considered permanent)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(rom, be called permanent memory)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(rom, be called permanent memory)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rom, be called permanent memory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rom, be called permanent memory)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rom, is permanent)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rom, is permanent)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(rom, is permenant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rom, is permanent)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rom, is permanent)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rom, is permenant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(rom, is permenant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rom, is permenant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rom, be considered permanent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rom, be considered permanent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rom, be considered permanent)