rom: is poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents file
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, app
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cd rom
Weight: 0.56
, nokia
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, pda
Weight: 0.33
, crt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor 1.00
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(crt, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pda, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pda, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pda, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(crt, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(crt, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rom, is poor)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rom, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rom, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rom, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rom, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rom, is poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rom, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pda, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rom, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(crt, has quality bad)