romania: have bad economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents market
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, european union
Weight: 0.55
Siblings germany
Weight: 0.35
, malta
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, poland
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad economy 1.00
have economy 0.95
is mixed economy 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(malta, is mixed economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(malta, is mixed economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(malta, is mixed economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(romania, have bad economy)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(romania, have economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(romania, is mixed economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(romania, have economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(romania, is mixed economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(romania, is mixed economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(romania, is mixed economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(romania, have economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(romania, have economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(romania, have bad economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(romania, have bad economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(romania, have bad economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(malta, is mixed economy)