romanticism: has state dark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movement
Weight: 0.67
, style
Weight: 0.64
, enlightenment
Weight: 0.56
, reaction
Weight: 0.53
, topic
Weight: 0.48
Siblings realism
Weight: 0.35
, naturalism
Weight: 0.35
, baroque
Weight: 0.35
, nationalism
Weight: 0.34
, puritanism
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state dark 1.00
be essential for dark reaction 0.76
provide energy for dark reactions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(topic, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(romanticism, has state dark)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reaction, be essential for dark reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(romanticism, has state dark)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reaction, provide energy for dark reactions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(romanticism, has state dark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(topic, has state dark)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(reaction, provide energy for dark reactions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reaction, be essential for dark reaction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(topic, has state dark)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(reaction, be essential for dark reaction)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(reaction, provide energy for dark reactions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(topic, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(romanticism, has state dark)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reaction, be essential for dark reaction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(romanticism, has state dark)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reaction, provide energy for dark reactions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(romanticism, has state dark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(romanticism, has state dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(romanticism, has state dark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(reaction, provide energy for dark reactions)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(topic, has state dark)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(reaction, be essential for dark reaction)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(topic, has state dark)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(reaction, provide energy for dark reactions)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(romanticism, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(reaction, be essential for dark reaction)