rome: was successful building

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.63
, republic
Weight: 0.60
, village
Weight: 0.58
, gentile
Weight: 0.58
Siblings egypt
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.33
, roman republic
Weight: 0.33
, roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, islam
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was successful building 1.00
was successful 0.89
was successful on trade 0.79
was built in first place 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(roman empire, was successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(roman empire, was successful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(roman empire, was successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(rome, was successful building)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rome, was successful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rome, was successful on trade)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rome, was successful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rome, was successful on trade)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rome, was successful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rome, was successful on trade)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(rome, was successful)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rome, was successful on trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rome, was successful building)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rome, was successful building)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rome, was successful building)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(roman empire, was successful)