romeo: be smart in juliet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lover
Weight: 0.60
, tale
Weight: 0.60
, romance
Weight: 0.58
, story
Weight: 0.58
, play
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fairy tale
Weight: 0.34
, jonah
Weight: 0.33
, jules verne
Weight: 0.33
, charlie
Weight: 0.32
, husband
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be smart in juliet 1.00
be in juliet 0.81
is juliet 0.80
go in juliet 0.79
be in love with juliet 0.79
hate in juliet 0.78
was in love with juliet 0.78
come on juliet 0.77
see juliet 0.77
put juliet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(romeo, be smart in juliet)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(romeo, be in juliet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(romeo, is juliet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(romeo, see juliet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(romeo, hate in juliet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(romeo, come on juliet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(romeo, go in juliet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(romeo, hate in juliet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(romeo, go in juliet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(romeo, hate in juliet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(romeo, go in juliet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(romeo, is juliet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(romeo, be in juliet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(romeo, see juliet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(romeo, come on juliet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(romeo, go in juliet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(romeo, be in juliet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(romeo, is juliet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(romeo, come on juliet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(romeo, hate in juliet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(romeo, see juliet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(romeo, be in juliet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(romeo, is juliet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(romeo, come on juliet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(romeo, see juliet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(romeo, be smart in juliet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(romeo, be smart in juliet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(romeo, be smart in juliet)