roofer: be at roof

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
, worker
Weight: 0.52
, handyman
Weight: 0.45
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.35
, electrician
Weight: 0.35
, mason
Weight: 0.35
, plumber
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at roof 1.00
build roof 0.94
nail roof material to roof 0.93
glass in porch 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(worker, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(roofer, be at roof)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(construction worker, nail roof material to roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(roofer, be at roof)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(contractor, glass in porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(roofer, be at roof)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(construction worker, nail roof material to roof)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(contractor, glass in porch)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(worker, be at roof)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(worker, be at roof)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, nail roof material to roof)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(contractor, glass in porch)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, build roof)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(worker, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(roofer, be at roof)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(construction worker, nail roof material to roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(roofer, be at roof)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(contractor, glass in porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(roofer, be at roof)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(carpenter, build roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(carpenter, build roof)

Salient implies Plausible

0.02
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(roofer, be at roof)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(roofer, be at roof)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(contractor, glass in porch)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(construction worker, nail roof material to roof)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(worker, be at roof)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(carpenter, build roof)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(construction worker, nail roof material to roof)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(contractor, glass in porch)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(roofer, be at roof) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(worker, be at roof)