room: has state dark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hotel room
Weight: 0.83
, house
Weight: 0.69
, locker room
Weight: 0.66
, bedroom
Weight: 0.64
Siblings laundry room
Weight: 0.86
, clean room
Weight: 0.76
, control room
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state dark 1.00
were dark in ancient egypt 0.76
has state damp 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hotel room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(room, has state dark)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hotel room, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(room, has state dark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hotel room, has state dark)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hotel room, has state damp)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, has state dark)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, has state damp)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(hotel room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(room, has state dark)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hotel room, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(room, has state dark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(room, has state dark)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(room, has state damp)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(room, has state damp)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(room, were dark in ancient egypt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(room, has state damp)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(room, were dark in ancient egypt)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(room, were dark in ancient egypt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(room, has state damp)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(room, were dark in ancient egypt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(room, has state dark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(room, has state dark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hotel room, has state dark)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hotel room, has state damp)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hotel room, has state dark)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(room, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hotel room, has state damp)