room: have bad lighting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hotel room
Weight: 0.83
, house
Weight: 0.69
, locker room
Weight: 0.66
, bedroom
Weight: 0.64
Siblings laundry room
Weight: 0.86
, clean room
Weight: 0.76
, control room
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad lighting 1.00
have lighting 0.97
have red lights 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(locker room, have lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(room, have bad lighting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(locker room, have lighting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have lighting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(locker room, have lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(room, have bad lighting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(room, have bad lighting)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(room, have lighting)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(room, have lighting)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(room, have lighting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(room, have red lights)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(room, have lighting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(room, have red lights)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(room, have red lights)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, have red lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(room, have bad lighting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(room, have bad lighting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(locker room, have lighting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(room, have bad lighting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(locker room, have lighting)