root canal: need done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.60
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
Siblings molar
Weight: 0.40
, water main
Weight: 0.33
, drain
Weight: 0.33
, water sport
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need done 1.00
is done 0.95
is needed 0.82
be done in two stages 0.78
need redone 0.77
be done in two visits 0.77
is necessary 0.76
be done in 2 visits 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(root canal, need done)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(root canal, is done)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(root canal, is done)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(root canal, is done)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(root canal, need redone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(root canal, need redone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(root canal, need redone)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(root canal, be done in two stages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(root canal, be done in two stages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(root canal, is needed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(root canal, need redone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(root canal, is needed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(root canal, is necessary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(root canal, be done in two stages)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(root canal, is needed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(root canal, be done in 2 visits)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(root canal, is necessary)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(root canal, be done in two visits)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(root canal, is done)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(root canal, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(root canal, be done in two visits)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(root canal, be done in two stages)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(root canal, be done in 2 visits)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(root canal, be done in 2 visits)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(root canal, be done in two visits)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(root canal, be done in 2 visits)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(root canal, be done in two visits)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(root canal, is needed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(root canal, is necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(root canal, need done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(root canal, need done)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(root canal, need done)