rotor: have holes in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.56
, electric motor
Weight: 0.51
, game
Weight: 0.50
, application
Weight: 0.50
Siblings caliper
Weight: 0.63
, stator
Weight: 0.55
, flagellum
Weight: 0.41
, valve
Weight: 0.33
, nozzle
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in them 1.00
has physical part holes 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(rotor, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(rotor, have holes in them)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rotor, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(rotor, has physical part holes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rotor, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rotor, has physical part holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(rotor, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rotor, has physical part holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(rotor, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(rotor, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rotor, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rotor, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rotor, have holes in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(rotor, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rotor, have holes in them)