rotor: is more expensive

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.56 , electric motor Weight: 0.51 , game Weight: 0.50 , application Weight: 0.50
Siblings	caliper Weight: 0.63 , stator Weight: 0.55 , flagellum Weight: 0.41 , valve Weight: 0.33 , nozzle Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is more expensive	1.00
is expensive	0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(electric motor, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(rotor, is more expensive)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(rotor, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(electric motor, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(electric motor, is expensive)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(caliper, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(electric motor, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(rotor, is more expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(rotor, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(caliper, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(caliper, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(rotor, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(rotor, is expensive)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(rotor, is expensive)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(rotor, is expensive)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(rotor, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(rotor, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(application, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(electric motor, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(caliper, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(application, is expensive)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(rotor, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(electric motor, is expensive)