rottweiler: be prone to cancer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.72
, breed
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, great dane
Weight: 0.45
, child
Weight: 0.45
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, small dog
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prone to cancer 1.00
get cancer 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, get cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rottweiler, be prone to cancer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, get cancer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, get cancer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, get cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, be prone to cancer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rottweiler, be prone to cancer)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rottweiler, get cancer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rottweiler, get cancer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, get cancer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, get cancer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, be prone to cancer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rottweiler, be prone to cancer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, get cancer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(rottweiler, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, get cancer)