round: be called round

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.59
, shape
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, style
Weight: 0.53
Siblings clinch
Weight: 0.33
, wildcard
Weight: 0.32
, beat
Weight: 0.31
, straight line
Weight: 0.31
, straight
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called round 1.00
is way round 0.91
be called short round 0.91
is opposite way round 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(clinch, is way round)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(clinch, is opposite way round)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(clinch, is way round)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(clinch, is way round)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(clinch, is opposite way round)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(clinch, is opposite way round)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(round, be called round)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(round, be called short round)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(round, be called short round)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(round, be called short round)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(round, be called short round)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(round, be called round)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(round, be called round)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(clinch, is way round)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(round, be called round)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(clinch, is opposite way round)