router: be used in networks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.69
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, hardware
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.62
Siblings modem
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, server
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in networks 1.00
have 2 networks 0.93
show 2 networks 0.90
be needed in network 0.86
get names of devices on network 0.85
defined network work 0.82
connecting computer to network 0.79
be used in data communication system 0.77
be important for computer systems 0.76
use odbc connections 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(software, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, be used in networks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(software, be important for computer systems)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, be used in networks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(software, be needed in network)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(software, be important for computer systems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(software, be important for computer systems)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(software, be needed in network)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(modem, connecting computer to network)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, be used in data communication system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(software, be needed in network)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(router, be used in networks)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(software, be important for computer systems)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(router, be used in networks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(modem, be used in data communication system)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(modem, connecting computer to network)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(modem, connecting computer to network)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(router, be used in networks)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(router, have 2 networks)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(router, show 2 networks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(router, get names of devices on network)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(router, have 2 networks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(router, have 2 networks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(router, have 2 networks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(router, show 2 networks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(router, get names of devices on network)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(router, show 2 networks)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(router, show 2 networks)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(router, get names of devices on network)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(router, get names of devices on network)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, be used in networks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(software, be needed in network)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(software, be important for computer systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(modem, connecting computer to network)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(software, be needed in network)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(router, be used in networks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(software, be important for computer systems)