router: is wireless

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.69
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, hardware
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.62
Siblings modem
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, server
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wireless 1.00
need modem 0.80
have wifi 0.78
have ethernet connections 0.77
get names of devices on network 0.77
have 2 ethernet 0.77
have multiple ethernet connections 0.77
have 2 antennas 0.76
has physical part antennas 0.76
have multiple antennas 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, have wifi)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, have 2 ethernet)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(server, have multiple ethernet connections)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(modem, is wireless)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(modem, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(modem, is wireless)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(motherboard, have wifi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(motherboard, have wifi)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(server, have multiple ethernet connections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(server, have multiple ethernet connections)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(motherboard, have 2 ethernet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(motherboard, have 2 ethernet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(router, is wireless)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(router, need modem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(router, get names of devices on network)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(router, need modem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(router, have 2 antennas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(router, has physical part antennas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(router, have multiple antennas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(router, need modem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(router, need modem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(router, has physical part antennas)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(router, has physical part antennas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(router, has physical part antennas)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(router, have 2 antennas)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(router, have multiple antennas)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(router, get names of devices on network)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(router, have multiple antennas)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(router, have 2 antennas)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(router, have multiple antennas)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(router, get names of devices on network)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(router, have 2 antennas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(router, get names of devices on network)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(router, is wireless)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(modem, is wireless)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(motherboard, have wifi)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(motherboard, have 2 ethernet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, is wireless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(server, have multiple ethernet connections)