rowing: has state running

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
Siblings swimming
Weight: 0.37
, sailing
Weight: 0.36
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.36
, synchronized swimming
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state running 1.00
is harder running 0.79
compare running 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(swimming, has state running)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(swimming, has state running)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(swimming, has state running)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(rowing, has state running)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(rowing, compare running)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(rowing, compare running)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rowing, compare running)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rowing, compare running)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rowing, is harder running)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(rowing, is harder running)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(rowing, is harder running)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rowing, is harder running)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rowing, has state running)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(rowing, has state running)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rowing, has state running)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(swimming, has state running)