rubber chicken: be silly

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prop
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, stuff
Weight: 0.47
Siblings rubber duck
Weight: 0.36
, rubber stamp
Weight: 0.34
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be silly 1.00
be suppose to be funny 0.84
be funny 0.82
be consider comical 0.82
be consider funny 0.80
be used to joke 0.77
be useless but still enjoyable 0.77
be use as joke 0.76
be used to fun 0.76
be fun 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rubber duck, be used to fun)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rubber duck, be used to fun)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rubber duck, be used to fun)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(rubber chicken, be consider comical)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rubber chicken, be suppose to be funny)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be consider comical)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(rubber chicken, be used to joke)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rubber chicken, be funny)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rubber chicken, be suppose to be funny)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be suppose to be funny)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(rubber chicken, be fun)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rubber chicken, be consider funny)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rubber chicken, be funny)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be funny)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(rubber chicken, be consider funny)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be consider funny)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be used to joke)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be funny)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be fun)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be use as joke)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(rubber chicken, be fun)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be use as joke)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(rubber chicken, be use as joke)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be consider funny)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be suppose to be funny)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(rubber chicken, be use as joke)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be fun)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be used to joke)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be consider comical)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(rubber chicken, be used to joke)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rubber chicken, be consider comical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rubber duck, be used to fun)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(rubber chicken, be silly)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)