rubber: be soft or hard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.69
, commodity
Weight: 0.62
, resin
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, crop
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.36
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, polyester
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be soft or hard 1.00
be hard 0.86
be strong and hard 0.84
be hard than plastic 0.79
be hard than iron 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(steel, be hard)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, be strong and hard)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(steel, be strong and hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(steel, be hard than iron)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than iron)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(steel, be hard than plastic)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steel, be hard than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(rubber, be soft or hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rubber, be soft or hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steel, be hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than plastic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steel, be strong and hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be soft or hard)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(steel, be hard than iron)