rubber: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.69
, commodity
Weight: 0.62
, resin
Weight: 0.62
, substrate
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.36
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, nylon
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum
Weight: 0.35
, polyester
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
feel good 0.80
has quality news 0.79
has quality resources 0.79
be good making 0.78
has consistency density 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rubber, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(polyester, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(polyester, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(steel, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(polyester, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nylon, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rubber, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(steel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(steel, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(polyester, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(polyester, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nylon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(nylon, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(polyester, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(polyester, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(polyester, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(polyester, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nylon, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(steel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(steel, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rubber, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rubber, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rubber, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rubber, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(rubber, be good making)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(rubber, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rubber, be good making)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rubber, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rubber, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rubber, be good making)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rubber, be good making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rubber, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(polyester, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(polyester, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(nylon, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(steel, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(polyester, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(steel, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(nylon, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rubber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)