ruby: be on rails more popular than django

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.69
, jewel
Weight: 0.57
, programming language
Weight: 0.57
, character
Weight: 0.56
, stone
Weight: 0.56
Siblings opal
Weight: 0.37
, sapphire
Weight: 0.36
, moonstone
Weight: 0.36
, pearl
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on rails more popular than django 1.00
be on rails popular 0.95
be on rails better 0.93
be on rails in 2015 0.92
be on rails used 0.91
be on rails 0.91
be on rails good 0.91
be on rails bad 0.90
be on rails getting 0.90
be on rails getting nowadays 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails used)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails popular)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails in 2015)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails getting nowadays)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails getting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails popular)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ruby, be on rails getting nowadays)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails in 2015)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails getting nowadays)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ruby, be on rails getting)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ruby, be on rails popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(ruby, be on rails better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ruby, be on rails used)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(ruby, be on rails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ruby, be on rails in 2015)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ruby, be on rails good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails used)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails getting nowadays)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails getting)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails popular)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails in 2015)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ruby, be on rails getting)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ruby, be on rails more popular than django)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ruby, be on rails more popular than django) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ruby, be on rails more popular than django)