rule: was in egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.64
, guideline
Weight: 0.64
, force
Weight: 0.64
, principle
Weight: 0.63
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.69
, mandate
Weight: 0.68
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65
, legislation
Weight: 0.64
, amendment
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in egypt 1.00
be in germany 0.76
be made for india 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rule, was in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(rule, was in egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rule, was in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rule, be made for india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(rule, was in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rule, be made for india)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rule, was in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rule, be made for india)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(rule, was in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rule, be made for india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(rule, was in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rule, was in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rule, was in egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rule, was in egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rule, was in egypt)