run: be in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home run
Weight: 0.65
, race
Weight: 0.65
, series
Weight: 0.64
, accident
Weight: 0.61
Siblings half
Weight: 0.55
, walk
Weight: 0.35
, pinch hitter
Weight: 0.34
, inning
Weight: 0.33
, grand slam
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in winter 1.00
happen on cold winter mornings 0.85
happen on winter mornings 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(accident, happen on cold winter mornings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(run, be in winter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(accident, happen on winter mornings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(run, be in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(accident, happen on cold winter mornings)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(accident, happen on winter mornings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accident, happen on winter mornings)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(accident, happen on cold winter mornings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(accident, happen on cold winter mornings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(run, be in winter)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(accident, happen on winter mornings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(run, be in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(run, be in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(run, be in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(run, be in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(accident, happen on winter mornings)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(accident, happen on cold winter mornings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(accident, happen on cold winter mornings)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(run, be in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(accident, happen on winter mornings)