run: is tide rated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents home run
Weight: 0.65
, race
Weight: 0.65
, series
Weight: 0.64
, accident
Weight: 0.61
Siblings half
Weight: 0.55
, walk
Weight: 0.35
, pinch hitter
Weight: 0.34
, inning
Weight: 0.33
, grand slam
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is tide rated 1.00
is tide 0.91
is line rated 0.79
is hard rated r 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(walk, is hard rated r)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(walk, is line rated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(walk, is line rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(walk, is line rated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(walk, is hard rated r) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(walk, is hard rated r)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(run, is tide rated)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(run, is tide)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(run, is tide)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(run, is tide)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(run, is tide)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(run, is tide rated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(run, is tide rated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(walk, is hard rated r)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(run, is tide rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(walk, is line rated)