running back: is paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid little 1.00
is paid 0.90
make less money 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(running back, is paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(running back, is paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(running back, is paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(running back, make less money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(running back, make less money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(running back, is paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running back, is paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(running back, make less money)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(running back, make less money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(running back, is paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(running back, is paid little)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(running back, is paid little)