running: be as root dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, motion
Weight: 0.57
, maneuver
Weight: 0.56
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, walking
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as root dangerous 1.00
is dangerous 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(walking, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(talking, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(talking, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(talking, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(walking, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(walking, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(running, be as root dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(running, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(running, is dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(running, is dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(running, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(running, be as root dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(running, be as root dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(talking, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(running, be as root dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(walking, is dangerous)