running: be beneficial to athletes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, motion
Weight: 0.57
, maneuver
Weight: 0.56
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, walking
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to athletes 1.00
is beneficial 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(talking, is beneficial)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(walking, is beneficial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(walking, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(walking, is beneficial)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(talking, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(talking, is beneficial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(running, be beneficial to athletes)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(running, is beneficial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(running, is beneficial)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(running, is beneficial)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(running, is beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(running, be beneficial to athletes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(running, be beneficial to athletes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, is beneficial)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(running, be beneficial to athletes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(walking, is beneficial)