running: burn belly fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, motion
Weight: 0.57
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.32
, walking
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32
, living thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
burn belly fat 1.00
burn fat 0.94
burn more fat 0.92
burn calories 0.82
burn about 100 calories 0.82
burn many calories 0.82
burn more calories 0.81
burn few calories 0.81
burn more calories than cycling 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(walking, burn more fat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(walking, burn more calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(walking, burn more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(walking, burn more fat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(walking, burn more calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(walking, burn more calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(running, burn belly fat)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(running, burn more fat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(running, burn more calories)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(running, burn more calories than cycling)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(running, burn more fat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(running, burn more calories)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(running, burn belly fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(running, burn belly fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(walking, burn more fat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(running, burn belly fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(walking, burn more calories)