rush: is underrated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, band
Weight: 0.59
, influence
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.56
Siblings blitz
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, passing
Weight: 0.32
, try
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is underrated 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rush, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(blitz, is underrated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rush, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(blitz, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(blitz, is underrated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rush, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rush, is underrated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rush, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rush, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rush, is underrated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rush, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rush, is underrated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rush, is underrated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(blitz, is underrated)