rust: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents damage
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, color
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.58
, time
Weight: 0.56
Siblings mildew
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.33
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.33
, fatigue
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality change 0.86
be bad for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mildew, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fatigue, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fatigue, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fatigue, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mildew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mildew, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(rust, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(rust, has quality change)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rust, has quality change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rust, has quality change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rust, has quality change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(rust, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(rust, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(rust, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rust, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rust, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rust, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fatigue, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mildew, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)